Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we add an anti-porn igset? #213

Open
TheTechRobo opened this issue Jan 27, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Should we add an anti-porn igset? #213

TheTechRobo opened this issue Jan 27, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@TheTechRobo
Copy link
Contributor

I don't watch, nor do I archive, porn.

Should we add some porn sites to the global igset?

Alternatively should we at least make an "antiporn" igset?

@brandongalbraith
Copy link

brandongalbraith commented Jan 27, 2022

This sounds antithetical to the idea of digital archival and preservation and something that should probably be left to individuals electing to use grab-site to manually define in their igset config.

@TheTechRobo
Copy link
Contributor Author

That makes sense. In that case, do you think adding a specialised igset for it would be good?

@brandongalbraith
Copy link

@TheTechRobo Hard to say; I've never had the need to ignore adult content in my web archival crawls. If you think there's a need, a course of action might be to spike an initial adult site igset and see what consumption of it by grab-site users (product market fit sort of thing).

@TheTechRobo
Copy link
Contributor Author

TheTechRobo commented Jan 28, 2022

I was archivinng a huuge number of a Reddit user's bookmarks for them; I'm not sure if they watch it themselves or if their bookmarks were just sketchy websites but I saw a LOT of itt in my queue.

Doesn't hurt to add one ig, I'll see if I have the time (and motivation :P)

edit: sorry for the double letters, my keyboard seems to bne running out of battery...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants