-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Instance Norm as normalization? #69
Comments
Hey @psteinb, No, I don't see any issue with that! You can try to adapt the IIDBatchNormnD to IIDInstanceNormnD: I think adapting the dimensions over which mean and std are computed should be sufficient to implement InstanceNorm. I'm currently implementing a version of Layer/GroupNorm. You can also take a look at that once I am done! Best, |
Alright, I'll look into |
Ok, I started working on it. I took the |
Hey @Gabri95, A minor question, for the batch normalisation the
(see also section 4.2 of your thesis) As I am implementing an instance norm, for an input batch of e.g. "images" BxCxWxH the instance norm requires to compute the mean and variance only across WxH for each sample and for each channel. (This way the mean values would have shape However, these instance norm normalisation coefficients do not represent an expectation value across the entire batch (rather only for the signals of a single channel). So I wonder, do I actually need to multiply my mean values with Would be cool to hear your thoughts. |
Dear @Gabri95
sorry to bug you. I am currently trying to come up with an equivariant Unet architecture which is very close to a "standard" Unet, I use as a reference. For this, I came across the matter of different normalization schemes. I looked at your implementations here and you appear to be focusing on batch norm only.
However, I was wondering if anything speaks against implementing InstanceNorm? The difference being that the mean/var is not computed across the entire batch, but rather across each sample in a batch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: