What do you think about Tanstack's example style?

[githorse]

In the Tanstack Table docs, an example takes me directly to an embedded CodeSandbox, like this. (The examples are all broken at the moment, but that's a different problem.) That means that, in order to see the sample code, I have to:

1. Load the page, which takes a couple of seconds to spin up the sandbox.
2. Click through into the src folder, look for the main.tsx file or whatever, and click on it.
3. Browser the code in the tiny vertical window between the sidebar and the grid.

Compare this with, say, MUI's docs, or Material React Table's. Here the code is already on the screen for me to browse (as is the component that results from that code), no loading time required. If I want to edit that code and play with it -- which happens much more rarely than just reading it -- there's a convenient [Open in CodeSandbox] link I can use.

My preference is probably pretty clear from the way I've phrased this: the second (MUI) style wins, hands down. But what do other people think?

[wxl2578]

The documentation of this library is bad, and there are many questions that no one responds to. I don’t know why so many people use it.

[KevinVandy]

I keep seeing reports of the code sandboxes not working for people, but whenever I check them out in the docs, they are all working out perfectly fine

However, maybe we out to switch over to Stackblitz like the Query docs