You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
The naming scheme for podman sub-command man pages creates a conflict when it comes to podman-compose because there is the sub-command and the underlying "provider". It yields this confusion: Debian vs upsteam. These two pages have the same name, in the same section of the manual, but they're talking about two different things: the podman-compose provider in the first case, and the podman compose sub-command in the second.
I have no suggestion for disentangling it, but the problem came up on the Discord server when a command told the user to go to the podman-compose(1) man page for a solution, but they got the first page linked above, which doesn't contain the solution. (The second one does.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
The naming scheme for
podman
sub-command man pages creates a conflict when it comes topodman-compose
because there is the sub-command and the underlying "provider". It yields this confusion: Debian vs upsteam. These two pages have the same name, in the same section of the manual, but they're talking about two different things: thepodman-compose
provider in the first case, and thepodman compose
sub-command in the second.I have no suggestion for disentangling it, but the problem came up on the Discord server when a command told the user to go to the
podman-compose(1)
man page for a solution, but they got the first page linked above, which doesn't contain the solution. (The second one does.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: