Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature request: three-character match pattern #252

Open
csessh opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

feature request: three-character match pattern #252

csessh opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@csessh
Copy link

csessh commented Oct 22, 2024

It's probably my personal rhythm that I always find myself typing three letters instead of two to match leaps.
I've been using leap.nvim for months and I just can't adjust that rhythm to find two key motion smooth.

If it's worth considering, I'm more than happy to work on this feature and submit a PR. unless there's a way to extend leap.vim to achieve this.

@ggandor
Copy link
Owner

ggandor commented Oct 22, 2024

It's not out of the question, might worth exploring.

unless there's a way to extend leap.vim to achieve this

No, lots of details depend on the 2-char pattern being an invariant (conflict resolution after the first key press, just to name one)... haven't really thought this through, but I'm a bit skeptical about being able to implement this feature without considerable complications.

@ggandor ggandor added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 22, 2024
@ggandor ggandor changed the title feature request: option to opt for a third letter to match feature request: option to opt for a three-character match pattern Oct 22, 2024
@ggandor ggandor changed the title feature request: option to opt for a three-character match pattern feature request: three-character match pattern Oct 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants