Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking issue: Stabilizing the Cell Space #2519

Open
12 of 22 tasks
EwoutH opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 6 comments
Open
12 of 22 tasks

Tracking issue: Stabilizing the Cell Space #2519

EwoutH opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@EwoutH
Copy link
Member

EwoutH commented Nov 25, 2024

A tracking issue for stabilizing the experimental Cell Space.

Mesa 3.0

A lot of active development, including:

Current spaces

Mesa 3.1

Integration and documentation.

Current spaces

Mesa 3.2

Stabilizing release

  • Integrate ContinuousSpace
  • Refine visualisation
  • Update tutorial
  • Switch over basic example models
  • Write migration guide

Current spaces

Mesa 4.0

  • Make new (optionally breaking) changes to Cell Space
  • Remove current spaces
  • Rename to "space"?

Everyone let me know what you think, especially @quaquel and @Corvince.

@Souvik9205
Copy link

Hi, I would like to work on this issue

@EwoutH
Copy link
Member Author

EwoutH commented Dec 8, 2024

Great! You can see what’s still TODO, feel free to pick one and start working on it.

@quaquel
Copy link
Member

quaquel commented Dec 12, 2024

@EwoutH, do we want to move over the basic examples as part of 3.2, or as part of 3.3?

Personally, I think it would make more sense to do it for 3.2.

@EwoutH
Copy link
Member Author

EwoutH commented Dec 12, 2024

I’m also good with 3.2, like the tracking issue currently states.

The big ticket item is integrating the Continuous Space, so we can keep a unified concept of space.

@quaquel
Copy link
Member

quaquel commented Dec 12, 2024

The big ticket item is integrating the Continuous Space, so we can keep a unified concept of space.

sounds like a fun thing for me to work on over the christmas break. In the mean time, I'll continue updating various examples to use all the new stuff that came in 3.1.

@EwoutH
Copy link
Member Author

EwoutH commented Dec 12, 2024

Actually, I might be interested to do some exploratory work on this over the weekend, as an integrated effort on integrating (parts of) Mesa-Geo.

We can do the MPIEvaluator combo, were I do some pathfinding and deliver a shit PoC and you make it a proper implementation ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants