Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TODO] Rewrite the plugin fetcher as a Sphinx extension #13081

Open
webknjaz opened this issue Dec 22, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

[TODO] Rewrite the plugin fetcher as a Sphinx extension #13081

webknjaz opened this issue Dec 22, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
topic: website about the pytest website type: docs documentation improvement, missing or needing clarification

Comments

@webknjaz
Copy link
Member

webknjaz commented Dec 22, 2024

Hey @nicoddemus @bluetech @RonnyPfannschmidt @The-Compiler are y'all married to the idea of committing this table to the Git repo as RST? I know how to write an in-repo Sphinx extension that would do this on build with proper caching. This would eliminate the need to keep updating RST.

Originally posted by @webknjaz in #12607 (comment)

@webknjaz webknjaz self-assigned this Dec 22, 2024
@webknjaz
Copy link
Member Author

I lost track of this and Bruno's endorsement of the idea (#12607 (comment)). So I'm filing this issue for visibility.

@webknjaz
Copy link
Member Author

@webknjaz webknjaz added type: docs documentation improvement, missing or needing clarification topic: website about the pytest website labels Dec 22, 2024
@webknjaz webknjaz moved this to 🗒️ Backlog 📝 in 📅 Procrastinating in public Dec 22, 2024
@Pierre-Sassoulas
Copy link
Member

Generally I like committing the resulting rst because it's easier to review the changes and you can see problems in the generation that you would miss otherwise. In that case the plugin list is very stable, automated, and barely need a review so +1 from me.

@RonnyPfannschmidt
Copy link
Member

I prefer the split of generate and doc build

I don't want to make general doc building dependent on a potentially failing process

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic: website about the pytest website type: docs documentation improvement, missing or needing clarification
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants