Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unit test for user settings menu #872

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 26, 2024
Merged

Unit test for user settings menu #872

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 26, 2024

Conversation

hiveer
Copy link
Collaborator

@hiveer hiveer commented Dec 25, 2024

What this PR does:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Type of changes
Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update

Feature/Issue validation/testing:

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes and relevant result summary.

  • Test A

  • Test B

  • Logs

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • I have added unit/e2e tests that prove your fix is effective or that this feature works.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
  • I have reviewed my own code and ensured that it follows the project's style guidelines.

Release note:


MR Summary:

The summary is added by @codegpt.

This Merge Request introduces unit tests for the user settings menu component and updates the component's Vue template for better usability and maintainability. Key updates include:

  1. Addition of unit tests for various states and interactions within the user settings menu, ensuring the component behaves as expected when the user has an email associated with their account and when they do not.
  2. Refactoring of the Vue template in the user settings menu component to improve readability and maintainability, including changes to how conditional rendering is handled for elements that depend on the presence of an email.
  3. Enhancement of the user interaction experience by adding IDs to elements for easier testing and modifying dialog interactions for confirming actions, ensuring a smoother user experience.

@hiveer hiveer self-assigned this Dec 25, 2024
@starship-github
Copy link

MR Evaluation:

This feature is still under test, evaluation are given by AI and might be inaccurate.

After evaluation, the code changes in the Merge Request get score: 98-100.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

  • @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
  • @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
  • @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
  • @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
  • @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
    Example:
    • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
    Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
    Examples:
    • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation
    for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.

About Us:

Visit the OpenCSG StarShip website for the Dashboard and detailed information on CodeReview, CodeGen, and other StarShip modules.

Copy link
Collaborator

@zhendi zhendi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@hiveer hiveer merged commit 22bbb13 into main Dec 26, 2024
3 checks passed
@hiveer hiveer deleted the csghub__unit-test-profile branch December 26, 2024 02:45
@starship-github
Copy link

The StarShip CodeReviewer was triggered but terminated because it encountered an issue: The MR state is not opened.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

  • @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
  • @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
  • @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
  • @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
  • @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
    Example:
    • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
    Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
    Examples:
    • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation
    for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants