Run Member tests in parallel

[AwesomePatrol]

On my local machine it brings down execution time from 5 minutes to 32s.

I added a port allocator which allocates ports in 11000-19000 range.

Issue: #18983

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AwesomePatrol
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jmhbnz for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @AwesomePatrol. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a etcd-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[serathius]

/ok-to-test

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.85%. Comparing base (f03dee9) to head (c1f333a).

Additional details and impacted files

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
server/embed/config.go	79.55% <100.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️

... and 24 files with indirect coverage changes

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #19035      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.73%   68.85%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         420      420              
  Lines       35623    35625       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        24486    24529      +43     
+ Misses       9702     9674      -28     
+ Partials     1435     1422      -13     

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f03dee9...c1f333a. Read the comment docs.

[AwesomePatrol]

/retest

[k8s-ci-robot]

@AwesomePatrol: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
pull-etcd-integration-1-cpu-amd64	bda32aa	link	true	/test pull-etcd-integration-1-cpu-amd64
pull-etcd-unit-test-386	2febbd8	link	true	/test pull-etcd-unit-test-386
pull-etcd-unit-test-arm64	2febbd8	link	true	/test pull-etcd-unit-test-arm64
pull-etcd-unit-test-amd64	2febbd8	link	true	/test pull-etcd-unit-test-amd64
pull-etcd-integration-2-cpu-amd64	2febbd8	link	true	/test pull-etcd-integration-2-cpu-amd64
pull-etcd-integration-2-cpu-arm64	2febbd8	link	true	/test pull-etcd-integration-2-cpu-arm64
pull-etcd-integration-1-cpu-arm64	2febbd8	link	true	/test pull-etcd-integration-1-cpu-arm64
pull-etcd-integration-4-cpu-amd64	2febbd8	link	true	/test pull-etcd-integration-4-cpu-amd64
pull-etcd-e2e-arm64	2febbd8	link	true	/test pull-etcd-e2e-arm64
pull-etcd-e2e-386	2febbd8	link	true	/test pull-etcd-e2e-386
pull-etcd-e2e-amd64	2febbd8	link	true	/test pull-etcd-e2e-amd64

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[mmorel-35]

In addition to this, have you considered using paralleltest ?