improved definition of pointed functor #229
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I think when I wrote the original I was looking at the "Pointed" typeclass in haskell which doesn't have a requirement of functor so I didn't think that it was necessary. And in a way it's not. A type is pointed if any value can be lifted into it but intuitively a type is only a pointed functor if it's both pointed and a functor. |
jethrolarson
force-pushed
the
jethrolarson-pointed
branch
from
cf90849 to
6c4dd7d
Compare
jethrolarson
force-pushed
the
jethrolarson-pointed
branch
from
6c4dd7d to
6d30175
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After reading https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39179830/how-to-use-pointed-functor-properly
I thought we should make the definition less wrong.