Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dependency: integrate github.com/mndrix/tap-go as internal package #767

Open
wants to merge 44 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fmuyassarov
Copy link

@fmuyassarov fmuyassarov commented May 4, 2023

Migrate the code of github.com/mndrix/tap-go as internal package with commit history as discussed in #766 (comment)
Fixes subset of the dependency issues described in #758.

I followed @thaJeztah suggestion of using git-filter-repo tool not to loose the git commit history while migrating the code and took the following steps.

git clone https://github.com/mndrix/tap-go.git
cd tap-go

git filter-repo 
      --path tap.go \
      --path yaml_yaml.go \
      --path yaml_json.go

git filter-repo \
     --path-rename yaml_json.go:util/yaml_json.go \
     --path-rename  yaml_yaml.go:util/yaml_yaml.go \
     --path-rename  tap.go:util/tap.go

# switch to the runtime-tools project
cd ../runtime-tools
git checkout -b integrate_tap_go
git remote add tap-go ../tap-go
git fetch tap-go
git merge --allow-unrelated-histories --signoff -S tap-go/master

As the next step, I will replace function calls of the tap-go and remove imports of github.com/mndrix/tap-go as an external package.

mndrix and others added 30 commits December 16, 2013 14:24
Using methods allows us to track some state while running tests.  This
means we don't have to manually track test numbers.  It also means we're
structurally similar to Go's testing package so that we can emulate it.
That should make it easier to port a test from testing to tap.
They don't start at 0 which is the zero value for nextTestNumber
Run a small TAP test using prove to make sure the output is parsed
correctly.
Perform the quick check and generate TAP output as appropriate.
And adjust the Makefile to make it easy to build future test/*/main.go
using a static pattern rule [1].  The TESTS entries are phony to force
rebuilds every time, because 'go build' includes logic to avoid
unnecessary rebuilds.

[1]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Static-Usage.html
tap: Teach Header to skip the plan when testCount < 1
It's very difficult to use "go get" to fetch a repository that ends with
.go  To avoid this problem, rename this repository to end with -go

Update the canonical import path accordingly.
This commit makes all test binaries follow the naming pattern
test/foo/test  This allows us to reference all test binaries with a
single glob pattern: test/*/test

The utility of this arrangements is already evident in .gitignore which
now needs only a single line and automatically ignores all future test
binaries.
Instead of running several separate prove commands (one per test), we
now run a single prove command which executes all tests itself.  This
gives us a single test summary after all tests have concluded which
should scale better as we add more tests.
The test programs in test/*/main.go all import
"github.com/mndrix/tap-go".  By default Go will look in the user's
GOPATH to find that package.  That means a user working on tap-go itself
has to install the untested, development version of the package into his
GOPATH before he can run the test suite.  That's inconvenient and likely
to break other code which relies on a working version of tap-go.

The hack in this commit creates a private GOPATH within our repository
which only includes the package under development.  Running the test
suite always uses the latest code in the repository and doesn't require
our developers to manually adjust their own GOPATH each time.
The old pattern said "this rule depends on whatever files exist and
match this glob".  The new pattern says "this rules depends on
test/auto/test and test/check/test and ... regardless of whether they
exist yet".

Without this change "make all" only ran tests which had already been
compiled.
This is a step towards sending TAP output to an arbitrary io.Writer
In some contexts a TAP test can't send output directly to stdout.
Instead it should be sent to some other writer (HTTP stream, buffer,
etc).  Allow this usage without breaking existing users.
The previous test suite only included passing tests.  We want to cover
failing tests too.
These are sometimes helpful in complex tests.
These produce diagnostic output, as defined by the TAP spec.
wking and others added 11 commits January 5, 2017 14:23
Use two harnesses, where the inner harness has failing tests and
writes to a buffer.  The outer harness checks that buffer to ensure
the output is appropriate.  This lets the whole test suite pass:

  $ make
  ...
  All tests successful.
  Files=6, Tests=15,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr  0.01 sys +  0.00 cusr  0.01 csys =  0.07 CPU)
  Result: PASS

while before this commit it failed:

  $ make
  ...
  Test Summary Report
  -------------------
  test/failing/test   (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 2)
    Failed tests:  1-2
  Files=6, Tests=15,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr +  0.00 sys =  0.05 CPU)
  Result: FAIL
  Makefile:7: recipe for target 'all' failed
  make: *** [all] Error 1
To verify the changes in opencontainers#4, I intentionally broke Diagnostic() by
prefixing lines with "!" instead of "#" but the tests still passed.
The spec[1] allows a test harness to silently ignore lines it doesn't
understand, so that behavior makes sense.

Red light green light testing[2] requires that our test be capable of
failing if something is broken.  This commit adds that by comparing
the actual output against our expected output.

Hat tip to @wking for suggesting to compare output[3].

1: http://testanything.org/tap-version-13-specification.html#anything-else
2: http://stackoverflow.com/a/404860/174463
3: mndrix/tap-go#4 (comment)
Now that we have a function to generate diagnostic output, we don't
have to construct it manually.

See opencontainers#4
test/failing: Wrap failing tests in another harness
The spec [1] suggests "ok 23 # SKIP ...", but if you attempt this with:

  t.Pass("# SKIP foo")

you get an extra hyphen ("ok 23 - # SKIP foo") which is parsed as a
successful test (and not a skipped test).

Michael gives the following example to motivate 'count' [2]:

  if ConditionIsMet() {
    t.Ok(Foo(), "foo")
    t.Ok(Bar(), "bar")
  } else {
    t.Skip(2, "condition not met")
  }

The spec example of this is in [3], showing no special syntax for
skipping multiple tests (although there is a special syntax for
skipping *all* the tests).

Also alphabetize TESTS in the Makefile.

[1]: http://testanything.org/tap-version-13-specification.html#skipping-tests
[2]: mndrix/tap-go#6 (comment)
[3]: http://testanything.org/tap-version-13-specification.html#skipping-a-few
The spec [1] suggests "not ok 13 # TODO ...", but if you attempt this
with:

  t.Fail("# TODO foo")

you get an extra hyphen ("not ok 13 - # TODO foo") which is parsed as
a failed test (and not a TODO test).

I'd initially written up an alternative to Ok:

  T.TODO(test bool, description string)

but Michael pointed out that future work may add additional test
methods (e.g. EqOk) and wanted to support those as well with something
like [2]:

  t.TODO = true
  t.Ok(Foo(), "foo")
  t.EqOk(Bar(), Baz(), "bar == baz")
  t.TODO = false  // could be done via defer too

or [2]:

  t.TODO( func () {
    t.Ok(Foo(), "foo")
    t.EqOk(Bar(), Baz(), "bar == baz")
  })

This commit adds a .TODO boolean following Michael's first proposal.

It also adds a Todo() method returning a copy of the test-state (but
setting TODO), which you can use to avoid altering the original
test-state's TODO value.  This can be useful when you don't want to
bother with a defer, or your TODO tests all live in an existing branch
of a function, or you want to chain methods for a one-off TODO test:

  t.TODO().Ok(Foo(), "foo")

To keep the count synchronized between sibling test states,
nextTestNumber is now a pointer.  We don't do anything to keep Writer
synchronized, because it's already part of the public API as a
non-pointer, and Michael is ok leaving this up to the caller [3].

[1]: http://testanything.org/tap-version-13-specification.html#todo-tests
[2]: mndrix/tap-go#6 (comment)
[3]: mndrix/tap-go#6 (comment)
Docs in [1].  I've used Go's JSON serializer to avoid external
dependencies, since JSON is a subset of YAML [2].  Prove is currently
choking on the results:

  $ prove test/yaml/test
  test/yaml/test .. Failed 1/2 subtests

  Test Summary Report
  -------------------
  test/yaml/test (Wstat: (none) Tests: 1 Failed: 0)
    Parse errors: Unsupported YAMLish syntax: '{' at /usr/lib64/perl5/5.22.3/TAP/Parser/YAMLish/Reader.pm line 101.

                  Bad plan.  You planned 2 tests but ran 1.
  Files=1, Tests=1,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr +  0.00 sys =  0.01 CPU)
  Result: FAIL
  $ prove --version
  TAP::Harness v3.35_01 and Perl v5.22.3

but node-tap [3] parses it fine:

  $ tap test/yaml/test
  test/yaml/test ........................................ 2/2
  total ................................................. 2/2

    2 passing (32.15ms)

    ok

  $ tap --version
  11.0.0

[1]: https://testanything.org/tap-version-13-specification.html#yaml-blocks
[2]: http://www.yaml.org/spec/1.2/spec.html
     $ curl -s http://www.yaml.org/spec/1.2/spec.html | grep -B1 JSON | head -n2
             The primary objective of this revision is to bring YAML into compliance
             with JSON as an official subset. YAML 1.2 is compatible with 1.1 for
[3]: http://www.node-tap.org/
So folks who are comfortable with the additional dependency can get
prove-compatible output.  Michael wants to stick with prove for tap-go
because it is widely installed [1], but folks using node-tap or other
consumers that can handle the JSON subset of YAML probably don't want
the external dependency.  Folks who want yaml.v2 can enable the yaml
build tag [2].  Folks who are ok with JSON don't have to set any build
tags.

The go-yaml dependency is the only Go producer listed in [3].  There
may be others, I haven't checked.

The Makefile changes include new uses of wildcards [4] to pick up
test/%/*.go siblings.  And I'm using the stem variable $* [5] in the
rule to pick up the whole test package (and not just main.go).

I'm not sure how Michael wants vendoring to work.  For the moment,
I've softened the 'GOPATH =' to a 'GOPATH ?=' and installed the
package in my local GOPATH.  It's possible that we want to stick with
'GOPATH =' and drop the package under gopath/ (via a Git submodule?).

[1]: mndrix/tap-go#7 (comment)
[2]: https://golang.org/pkg/go/build/#hdr-Build_Constraints
[3]: http://yaml.org/
[4]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Wildcard-Examples.html
[5]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Automatic-Variables.html
* yaml:
  Add 'yaml' build tag for conditionally using gopkg.in/yaml.v2
  Add YAML() for generating YAML blocks
@fmuyassarov fmuyassarov requested a review from a team as a code owner May 4, 2023 14:11
@fmuyassarov
Copy link
Author

@thaJeztah shall I perhaps do the function call replacement on the same PR or would you prefer it to be on a separate PR?

@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

I see this PR does not include the

  • test directory and Makefile (perhaps something to consider; at least the tests to have some test coverage?)
  • README.md (TBD, but could include a mention where this code was forked from)
  • LICENSE (it has a different license than this repository, in which case I guess the original license should be preserved); https://github.com/mndrix/tap-go/blob/master/LICENSE

shall I perhaps do the function call replacement on the same PR or would you prefer it to be on a separate PR?

I think it's good to add those commits here;

  • a commit that removes the // import comment in tap.go (and updates other references)
- package tap // import "github.com/mndrix/tap-go"
+ package tap
  • a commit that replaces the uses (github.com/mndrix/tap-go -> github.com/opencontainers/runtime-tools/tap) and removes it from go.mod and vendor
  • ☝️ with that included, this PR (as a whole) shows that it's migrating the old files to the new location (git / github shows them as a "move")

Other enhancements after that could be done in a follow-up

For the failing DCO sign-off, I think in the past we got an exemption from the legal team at CNCF, but it's probably worth checking if that's needed.

Signed-off-by: Muyassarov, Feruzjon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Muyassarov, Feruzjon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Muyassarov, Feruzjon <[email protected]>
@fmuyassarov
Copy link
Author

For the failing DCO sign-off, I think in the past we got an exemption from the legal team at CNCF, but it's probably worth checking if that's needed.

Thanks for the suggestions @thaJeztah. I have addressed above comments. Regarding DCO, would you mind to share who should I contact from the CNCF team?

@fmuyassarov
Copy link
Author

ping @thaJeztah

@fmuyassarov
Copy link
Author

Hi @thaJeztah . Please take a look when you have some time. Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants