Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated Resyntax fixes #464

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Automated Resyntax fixes #464

wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

resyntax-ci[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@resyntax-ci resyntax-ci bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Resyntax fixed 20 issues in 6 files.

  • Fixed 6 occurrences of let-to-define
  • Fixed 6 occurrences of tidy-require
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of if-let-to-cond
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of cond-let-to-cond-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of define-let-to-double-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of define-syntax-syntax-rules-to-define-syntax-rule
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of always-throwing-if-to-when
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of map-to-for
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of arrow-contract-with-rest-to-arrow-contract-with-ellipses

resyntax-ci bot added 10 commits December 18, 2024 00:16
Keep imports in `require` sorted and grouped by phase, with collections before files.
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
This `map` operation can be replaced with a `for/list` loop.
`cond` with internal definitions is preferred over `if` with `let`, to reduce nesting
This `let` expression can be pulled up into a `define` expression.
Using `when` and `unless` is simpler than a conditional with an always-throwing branch.
This `define-syntax` macro can be replaced with a simpler, equivalent `define-syntax-rule` macro.
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
…ellipses`

This `->*` contract can be rewritten using `->` with ellipses.
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants