Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Makefile for release #96

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add Makefile for release #96

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

stsewd
Copy link
Member

@stsewd stsewd commented Jan 19, 2021

No description provided.

@stsewd stsewd requested a review from a team January 19, 2021 23:39
Copy link
Contributor

@agjohnson agjohnson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems helpful, but the team should consider standard tooling and patterns going forward. I'd like to get towards having common patterns on our repos, and I don't think we use make anywhere else currently.

from setuptools import setup, find_packages
from setuptools import find_packages, setup

from readthedocs_ext import __version__
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We're using bump version on the theme and I'd like to start using that on all of our projects. It's a solution that doesn't require importing or reading files to get the version number, and allows us to standardize on setup.cfg as well.

readthedocs/common#38

clean:
rm -rf dist/

.PHONY: release clean tag
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like a good improvement. I would like to settle on more common tooling patterns across our repos going forward though. On the other repos we're using inv for this, which I quite like. That could maybe be a next step though. I'm generally a fan of make otherwise.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 on standardization. I see that release depends on clean - not sure if invoke supports that sort of dependency tracking though. Brett Cannon asked on Twitter the other day and after a few recommendations, he went for doit https://twitter.com/brettsky/status/1382122878225686529

Copy link
Member

@ericholscher ericholscher Apr 19, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aren't we already using invoke for this? All our .org release tooling is built on it, so we should definitely standardize on that.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@astrojuanlu yeah, doit helps a lot with cached dependencies too. However, invoke supports pre-tasks http://docs.pyinvoke.org/en/latest/getting-started.html?highlight=pre#declaring-pre-tasks

I'm also 👍🏼 to avoid makefile and use invoke here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants